Which type of meaning do courts prioritize in legal interpretation?

Courts prioritize plain meaning in legal interpretation because it focuses on understanding the language of statutes or legal documents based on the ordinary meanings of the words used at the time they were written. Plain meaning helps ensure that the law is applied consistently and fairly, without relying on subjective interpretations that could vary widely between individuals. This approach allows for a clearer understanding of legal texts, promoting legal certainty and predictability.

Other meanings, such as implied meaning, often require deeper analysis and subjective judgment, which can introduce ambiguity. Emotional meaning is typically irrelevant in legal contexts, as the law is designed to be objective rather than influenced by sentiments. Historical meaning can provide context but is usually secondary to the plain meaning of the words as written. By prioritizing plain meaning, courts aim to uphold the rule of law and ensure that laws are accessible and comprehensible to the public.