What do courts primarily look to when interpreting a law?

When courts interpret a law, they primarily seek to understand legislative intent. This means they focus on the purpose and goals that the lawmakers had in mind when they enacted the legislation. Understanding the legislative intent allows courts to apply the law in a manner that aligns with the intentions of the legislature, ensuring that the law serves its intended purpose and functions effectively within the legal system.

Judicial precedent, while significant, serves more as a framework for how similar cases have been handled in the past, guiding courts in maintaining consistency in the law. Public opinion can offer insights into societal values and norms but is not a primary basis for legal interpretation, as courts aim to apply the law rather than adapt it to current public sentiment. Case law, referring to previously decided cases that can influence decisions, is also important but is largely derived from judicial precedent. Consequently, while these elements inform judicial decision-making, understanding legislative intent remains the essential cornerstone in interpreting statutes.