What do courts base their decisions on when interpreting statutes?

Courts primarily focus on clear legislative intent when interpreting statutes. This principle emphasizes that the objective of judicial interpretation is to determine what the lawmakers intended when they enacted the legislation. Analyzing the language of the statute, its purpose, and the context in which it was created helps the court discern the intended meaning and application of the law.

While courts may consider public opinion, previous court rulings, and current societal norms, these factors do not take precedence over legislative intent. Previous court rulings can provide precedent for interpretation but ultimately serve to inform judges of how similar issues have been resolved in the past rather than dictate the specific application of a statute. Similarly, public opinion and societal norms might influence lawmakers but are not decisive factors for a court’s interpretation, as courts are tasked with interpreting the law based on its established meaning rather than fluctuating public sentiments.