In a non-jury case, who acts as the trier of fact?

In a non-jury case, the judge serves as the trier of fact. This means that the judge is responsible for evaluating the evidence presented in the case and determining the facts based on that evidence. Unlike jury cases where a group of jurors is tasked with this responsibility, in a bench trial, the judge assumes both the roles of determining the law and assessing the factual circumstances.

This role involves hearing testimonies, considering the physical evidence, and applying the law to those facts to reach a verdict. The judge's decision is typically final on the factual issues presented, as there is no jury to deliberate and provide an independent assessment. This is a fundamental aspect of judicial procedure in non-jury cases, ensuring that disputes can be resolved efficiently and with the expertise of a legal professional.