How do courts generally begin to interpret a statute?

Courts typically start interpreting a statute by determining the plain meaning of the text. This approach involves looking at the language of the statute itself to ascertain its clear, ordinary meaning. Legal interpretation aims to give effect to legislative intent, and starting with the plain meaning ensures that the statute is applied in a way that aligns with its written terms.

The plain meaning rule is favored because it provides a straightforward method for judges to understand the law without delving into subjective interpretations. This foundational step sets the stage for any further analysis, allowing the court to evaluate whether the text is unambiguous. If the language is clear, courts usually apply it as is, leading to more predictable and stable legal outcomes.

This method tends to be the starting point in legal analysis as it respects the authority of the legislature and honors the principle of legality, which dictates that individuals should be governed by laws that are clear and accessible.